What if We Put Adam Ondra’s Brain in Donald Trump’s Body?

There are two types of climbers: those who take grades seriously and those who pretend not to care. Most climbers would admit that grades are subjective (“of course!”)… but push them on that point just a little, and you’ll also find that this subjectivity has some reasonable limits. We might quibble over whether something is 5.11d or 5.12a, or whether a route may be harder for taller/shorter people, but no one is going to mistake a 5.11 for a 5.13—unless you’re doing FAs of obscure “R-rated” desert off-widths … but that’s a whole other rant (or podcast). Most climbers believe there are a set of inarguable characteristics to each and every rock climb—the size of the holds, the steepness and length of the wall, the nature of rest points, etc.—that add up to some kind of objective measurement of difficulty. This calculus may not always be perfect or universal, but […]
To access this post, you must become a supporter of Evening Sends. Please consider supporting this site by choosing an Annual Subscription or Monthly Subscription. If you are already a subscriber, please log in to read this story.

About The Author

Andrew Bisharat

Andrew Bisharat is a writer and climber based in western Colorado. He is the publisher of Evening Sends and the co-host of The RunOut podcast.

Free Climb. Free Thought.

Join the climbing discourse.

Comments

0 Comments

Send it!

 

 

... To your inbox 🤓

Stay in the super loop on climbing's best discourse

You have Successfully Subscribed!