The Evening Sends Guide to Choosing Climbing Ropes

The climbing rope is responsible for saving thousands of climbers’ lives every single day. No piece of gear is more important than your rope. It’s not only your lifeline, but a link to your partner—and your ticket to a wild, high place. It’s a metaphor for everything that is truly meaningful in this vertical sport. It’s also a pretty cool piece of gear.

Early climbing ropes (from the 1700s up to the 1930s) appeared around alpine villages like Zermatt, Switzerland, and were made of braided hemp, flax, manila, cotton or horsehair. These early experiments resulted in climbing cords with terrible strength-to-weight ratios, poor durability and low elasticity. They snapped in falls easily, often resulting in tragedy. The mantra of the era, “The leader must not fall,” wasn’t just a catchy phrase.

World War II was a catalyst for innovation in the climbing world, with advances made in carabiners and pitons. However, nothing revolutionized climbing as greatly as the introduction of ropes made of nylon, a material Arnold Wexler of the U.S. Bureau of Standards concluded, in 1945, was superior to all other materials for this application. In 1953, the German rope manufactuer Edelrid introduced the kernmantle rope, an even bigger innovation that resulted in extremely durable ropes that didn’t kink or twist—and best of all, they could handle repeated lead falls. A kernmantle rope has a strong braided-nylon “core” of strands (the kern) that are encased within an abrasion-resistant sheath (the mantle). All modern climbing ropes now use the kernmantle design.

Today, climbing ropes are extremely reliable. “The leader must not fall” has been replaced with “If you don’t fall, you’re not trying hard enough!” There are over 100 different climbing ropes on the market, all of which come in various lengths, diameters, and categories. It’s important to understand how ropes are classified before making a purchase. Here is a basic primer for getting onto the sharp end.

Static vs. Dynamic Climbing Ropes

This is the most general categorization of ropes, but also the most important to not confuse. Static ropes do not stretch. Dynamic ropes stretch a lot. Static ropes are not for lead climbing! Because static ropes don’t stretch, climbers typically use them for hauling loads on big-walls, or fixing lines on new routes. Static ropes can be used for top-roping, but, again, never for leading. The elastic qualities of a dynamic rope are what make falling on lead safe because, with rope stretch, the forces on the gear, belayer and climber go way down. Dynamic ropes are what you will use 99 percent of the time.

Single vs. Double vs. Twin Ropes

The next most important categorization is knowing whether your rope is certified as a single rope, a double rope, or a twin rope. All climbing ropes come with a little tag, placed on each rope end, that tells you the rope’s certification. Single ropes are identified with a number “1” inside a circle. Double (or “half”) ropes have “1/2” inside a circle. Twin ropes have a sideways “8” inside a circle. (This information can also be found on the rope’s packaging.)

This certification—a standard regulated by the Union Internationale des Associations d’Alpinisme (UIAA)—deems a rope’s approved usage.

Single ropes—ropes certified to be used as a single strand that is clipped to every piece of protection—are the most common ropes used in rock climbing. Typically, single ropes come in 9.2- to 10.2-mm diameters, but there are single ropes on the market that are as thin as 8.9 mm and as thick as 11 mm.

Double/half ropes—two ropes used together but with each strand clipped to separate pieces of protection—are sometimes used on trad climbs that have zigzagging protection (where a single rope would create too much rope drag), or on ice/alpine climbs, where you need two ropes to rappel. These ropes are typically 8- to 9-mm thick.

Twin ropes—two ropes clipped together through every piece of protection—are the thinnest ropes of all, going down to 7.5 mm in diameter.

Never confuse these certifications: using a double or twin rope as a single rope could result in a catastrophe.

Single ropes are ideal for most climbing situations, from top-roping to single-pitch sport climbing and even to multi-pitch trad climbing.

Diameter

Unlike the American waistline, climbing ropes have been getting skinnier. Twenty years ago, almost all ropes were 11 mm or thicker in diameter. Now, most single ropes are between 9 and 10 mm. To get ropes thinner without sacrificing their strength, manufacturers have improved weaving technologies and especially learned how to make thinner sheaths.

Technology, however, can only do so much, and in general thinner ropes equal a compromise in durability, especially when it comes to the sheath. On the other hand, thinner ropes are lighter, which means less weight tugging down on you on a long lead.

If you mostly top-rope, or occassionally do some leading on sub 100-foot pitches, then weight might be less of a concern for you, and you should go with a thicker rope (between 10 and 10.5 mm) because they will last longer.

For general leading on sport and trad climbs, ropes in the 9.6 to 9.9 mm range are a solid bet. Because skinnier ropes are difficult to grip, in inexperienced hands they can be harder to belay, and result in faster, less-controlled rappels. Ropes in the 9.2 to 9.5 mm range are better suited to more experienced climbers/belayers.

Nothing wears out a rope’s sheath like sport climbing: the abuse of hangdogging and falling on a long-term project can abrade through the sheath quickly, sometimes in a matter of days. If you are a sport climber who enjoys working on projects—which involves a lot of falling before you finally redpoint—you might consider using two ropes of two different diameters. One rope would be your workhorse: thicker and more durable, around 9.8 mm. The second rope would be ultra-light, between 9.1 and 9.4 mm, and reserved for redpoint/performance burns, where every gram of weight counts.

That said, diameter is but one element that contributes to a rope’s durability. There are 9.2 mm ropes on the market that have outperformed and outlived rope’s of much thicker girth due to higher quality manufacturing.

Consider your own weight, too. Beefier climbers will want a beefier rope.

A final consideration is your belay device. Know what range of rope diameters your belay device is approved to work with and don’t stray outside those parameters.

Length

Just as ropes are getting skinnier, so are they getting longer. Fifty-meter ropes (165 feet) used to be standard 20 years ago. Now, 60- and 70-meter (200- and 230-foot) ropes are standard, and some sport climbers are even opting for 80- and 100-meter ropes to tackle today’s brand of ultra-long routes.

If you are climbing at a single-pitch crag, whether for top-roping or leading, the length of the crag’s routes will determine how long your rope should be. If the routes are 100 feet tall, then a 60-meter rope is just barely long enough for you to climb up and then be lowered down.

Many climbing accidents occur every year when climbers lower off of climbs on ropes that are too short to get them back to the ground; the belayer isn’t paying attention and the end of the rope slips through their hands, and the climber drops to the ground. Always tie a knot in the other end of the rope in order to prevent this type of accident.

When your rope’s sheath wears through (from repeated hangdogging/falling, etc.), you don’t need to buy a whole new rope; you can just cut the rope above the damaged area (which typically appears 10 to 15 feet from the rope’s end) and continue using the cord. Indeed, over the course of your rope’s life, you will end up cutting your rope a number of times—lobbing 10 to 15 feet off the end each time. Suddenly, your 60-meter rope is down to 50 meters, and isn’t long enough to use at your 100-foot tall home crag.

Two things: 1) keep a written record of how long your rope is after each trimming so you know its approximate length, and always be conservative when climbing new routes; 2) Consider getting a longer cord! Even if you are only climbing 30-meter long routes, a 70-meter rope might be a sound investment because you have 10 meters you can hack off the ends before your rope is too short to use.

Dry treatment

Standard non-treated ropes will absorb water; using one to ice climb would quickly result in your rope becoming as useless as a frozen-solid garden hose left out all winter. Manufacturers have developed a variety of procedures to give ropes a degree of waterproofness, either by bathing just the outer sheath in a waterproofing treatment, or by waterproofing both the sheath and core. Some companies use silicone-based treatments and some use those based on cross-linking polymers.

Dry-treated ropes are mandatory for any type of ice or alpine climbing. Also, according to a UIAA report, a sopping-wet rope weakens the nylon and could potentially be unsafe. Indeed, nylon is very water absorbant, and it loses its elasticity and energy-absorbing properties when wet.

Dry-treated ropes are more expensive than standard ropes. If you don’t plan to use your rope for ice or alpine climbing, then you can save some bucks by going with a standard rope. Standard ropes also seem to pick up less dirt particles than dry-treated ropes, and therefore stay cleaner. Ropes turn black and grimy from the dry treatments.

Bi-color. Rope markers.

A “bi-color” rope employs two distinct colors or patterns on either half. This feature allows you to easily find the middle of the rope—very helpful when setting up belays or when lowering your partner off of a pitch. Other ropes use a foot-long black mark to identify the rope’s middle.

Of course, as soon as you cut the ends of your rope, these markings become less exact—a potentially dangerous situation. Another downside is that bi-color ropes tend to be more expensive.

Finally, don’t use a magic marker to mark the middle of your rope. A report conducted by the UIAA found that using any kind of pen or marker to mark the rope results in a 50 percent decrease in strength! However, another report by Kolin Powick at Black Diamond found that this issue isn’t totally settled.

Bottom Line: What Do I Really Need?

Most people will want a single rope around the 9.5mm-9.8mm range, 60 meters long, and unless you’re an ice climber, without a dry treatment.

Price is an important factor, and all the usual sites will invariably have sales on ropes so it’s always a good idea to be on the lookout for good deals on your rope. If you’re climbing a ton, especially projecting sport climbs, expect to go through a rope once a year, if not more frequently. Otherwise, weekend warriors who aren’t falling a ton can expect their ropes to last up to 3 years before I’d suggest replacing just to be safe.

Ropes are like climbing shoes in that you can find yourself discovering a brand that you like and trust, and sticking with it for a long time. For me, companies like Beal, Mammut, Maxim, Edelrid, Edelweiss, and Sterling represent the top tier of rope manufacturers, and their products have yet to let me down. The others are hit or miss.

Bottom line, the best ropes are the ones that don’t kink easily, are super durable, easy to clip and tie knots, and don’t weigh a ton. All ropes wear out, and because this is the most important piece of equipment you’ll buy, it’s a great idea to always make sure your rope is in good condition.

About The Author

Andrew Bisharat

Andrew Bisharat is a writer and climber based in western Colorado. He is the publisher of Evening Sends and the co-host of The RunOut podcast.

Free Climb. Free Thought.

Join the climbing discourse.

Comments

11 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Do you have a link to this study you could post?”UIAA found that using any kind of pen or marker to mark the rope results in a 50 percent decrease in strength!”Thanks.

    Reply
    • Avatar

      Yes, I updated the text with a link to the UIAA article …

      I also found a link from Kolin at BD that shows that this issue isn’t settled.

      Reply
  2. Avatar

    Good general overview, AB — but I’d like to know more.

    For example, how does rope stiffness or softness affect things like wear, handling/clipping ability, “setting” knots, etc?  And does dry treatment actually reduce the tendency of a rope to acquire “rope black” from lowering off chains and mussys?  And should sheath durability be one of the primary concerns when purchasing a rope for long-term use, regardless of handling?I recently used two ropes with completely different characteristics:  Mammut Climax (9.6 non-dry) and Maxim Pinnacle (9.5 dry).  The Mammut is was very supple to handle, but is currently filthy black from lowering off anchors.  The Maxim is really stiff, but the sheath on this thing seems indestructible.

    What are your thoughts?

    Reply
    • Avatar

      Hey, thanks for the comment. First, I don’t think there are any hard and fast rules to the questions you are asking. But, anyway, here are my thoughts on your questions:

      1) Stiffness/softness could mean two different things: softness of the catch, and softness in terms of knot tying/”setting.” I think you’re asking about stiffness in terms of rope handling, but they are two sides of the same coin. Ideally, you want a stiffer rope because it will clip to biners well (a soft rope is mush, and harder to snap through the carabiner gate). I’ve also found that stiffer-handling ropes last longer (though not as a rule–a lot has to do with weave and quality of manufacturing). That said, a really stiff rope doesn’t set knots as well, and they also tend to yield a harder catch. Some ropes feel like steel cables when you fall on them; others like bungee cords (most are somewhere in the middle).

      Dry treatments actually seem to cause ropes to become black. It’s interesting that your Mammut Climax has gotten so dirty. I’ve been using that rope, and as it lacks a dry treatment, I’ve found that it has actually stayed quite clean.

      The rope industry is not forthcoming with the actual procedures they use to dry-proof ropes, and to be honest, they don’t seem to have a clear idea about which types of dry treatments are the ones that cause ropes to turn black/silvery/grimy and ones that don’t.

      Yes, I think sheath durability is probably the most important concern if you want a rope for long-term use … That said, it’s possible to core shot a rope without damaging the sheath from multiple falls or just general wear and tear. You have to inspect your rope for “soft spots” to see if your core is damage. The test I use is: if you can pinch the rope sides together easily so they are plush with each other, then the core is probably compromised. Typically, you want a little space or gap, or at least some resistance to being able to push the bite of rope together like that …

      The reason that the sheath on the Maxim Pinnacle is holding up so well is because it’s a twill pattern design. Look at the weave on this sheath: it’s just one strand crossing over another. Most ropes have two strands crossing over two other strands. The Twill Pattern–as I’ve experienced in my tests–is extraordinarily durable because it’s such a tight weave. The reason all rope companies don’t always use twill patterns, as I understand it, is that it’s really hard to make a twill rope that isn’t prone to lots of kinking.

      Anyway … those are a few thoughts of the top of my head! Hope that’s helpful

      Reply
      • Avatar

        wow that was insanely helpful.

        Reply
  3. Avatar

    I feel like the idea that stiffer ropes give a hard harder catch is somewhat of a misconception. It might be true if you were to compare two new ropes, but with used ropes, I feel like the sheath wear plays a big role. If you have a softer rope with a fuzzy sheath, it seems to cause greater friction through all the carabiners the rope is going through. A rope that retains some smoothness to the sheath will slide better through the quickdraws and the force of the fall is actually transmitted to all of the rope out and the belayer, making for a softer catch.

    Maybe I’m talking smack but all the falls that I’ve taken that seemed to nearly break me in half have been on ropes that were fuzzy. Also the maxim pinnacle is an amazing rope for the price. 

    Reply
  4. Avatar

    I feel like the idea that stiffer ropes give a hard harder catch is somewhat of a misconception. It might be true if you were to compare two new ropes, but with used ropes, I feel like the sheath wear plays a big role. If you have a softer rope with a fuzzy sheath, it seems to cause greater friction through all the carabiners the rope is going through. A rope that retains some smoothness to the sheath will slide better through the quickdraws and the force of the fall is actually transmitted to all of the rope out and the belayer, making for a softer catch.

    Maybe I’m talking smack but all the falls that I’ve taken that seemed to nearly break me in half have been on ropes that were fuzzy. Also the maxim pinnacle is an amazing rope for the price. 

    Reply
  5. Avatar

    What about an article like this on when to trim/retire ropes?

    We could discuss the pinch test (to test for the core), the frayed or fuzzy observations, the elasticity on falls (getting less as the rope ages,) the ever expanding waistline as ropes age, can you see the white inner sheath (bad!). The x-ray text… I’m sure you know of more.
    I use an 80-20 rule, once 80 percent of my climbing friends mention how scared they are of my rope its time to retire it. But usually a ropes looks go long before actually functionality (considering that rope accidents seem to only happen from repelling errors or getting cut on sharp rocks.) 

    Reply
  6. Avatar

    What about Beal’s new technology?

    Reply
  7. Avatar

    Are dry ropes or non-dry ropes best for climbing?

    Reply
    • Andrew Bisharat

      Dry ropes are mandatory for ice climbing, but if all you do is climb rock, you can get a non-dry

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send it!

 

 

... To your inbox 🤓

Stay in the super loop on climbing's best discourse

You have Successfully Subscribed!